Last year, in my Professional
Learning Community, we set goals for student improvement, using North West
Evaluation Assessment (NWEA). It was a struggle, as it was our first year of
implementation. I was wondering if anyone else had used the student goal
setting for student improvement. If so how did it go for you? Also did you have
negative growth and if so how did you approach the student with their negative
growth? As we had some students with negative growth and teachers were
wondering how should they approach their students with this information?
Welcome To My World of Blogging
Wednesday, June 10, 2015
Thursday, April 23, 2015
Reflection
What
do you think the perceptions of distance learning will be in the future (in
5–10 years; 10–20 years)?
The perceptions of distance learning will change
in 5-10 years through the use of virtual learning environments. As technology
has evolved and right along education has evolved. “The newer technologies
dominate what the older technologies…can’t fill (Simonson et al. 2012).” I can
see that in the future that education will eventually a more personalized
education and more virtual learning environments, where learners will have a strong
sense of a virtual presence (Dede, 2005). In 5 to 10 years distance will become more
popular and more of a normal way to attend classes and augmented realities will
become more popular.
According to Dede, “Mirroring with virtual
environments that replicate physical settings but also provide magical
capabilities for immersive experience.” So this means that in 10 to 20 years
educational environment will be more of an environment that will be replicated
through the use of technology. This technology will give the appearance of
holograph face-to-face classroom environment that will use an asynchronous
concept that will provide open access for students to attend a class around
their busy schedule.
How
can you as an instructional designer be a proponent for improving societal
perceptions of distance learning?
An instructional designer can
be proponent for improving societal perceptions through the use of positive
engaging trainings and through the use of keeping up with technology and
embracing this technology and not being afraid to use it, as so many people
are. As instructional designer I will also improve societal perceptions by
being the forerunner of using and fostering “emergent” technology in developing
my trainings (Dede 2005).
Also, as an instructional designer I need
to be alert for “Naïve managers and subject matter experts that do not
recognized that there are specialized e-learning designs and development skills”,
this will help improve the perceptions of distance learning through creating
impressive design content (2008).
How
will you be a positive force for continuous improvement in the field of
distance education?
Since my first distance
education class, I have been a positive force in field of distance education. I
believe that distance education is changing the face of education and the way
that we think about learning and learning environments. As a student and an
instructional designer, I can use both my learning experiences and career to be
a positive for continuous improvement. I will also design content that is
aligned to standards and providing resources to high-risk students (Huett et
al, 2008).
Resources
Dede, C. (2005). Planning for neomillennial
learning styles. Educause Quarterly, 28(2), 7-12.
Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W. R., &
Coleman, C. (2008). The Evolution of Distance Education: Implications for
Instructional Design on the Potential of the Web. Part 3: K-12. Techtrends:Linking Research And Practice To
Improve Learning, 52(5), 63-67.
Moller, L., Foshay, W. R., & Huett, J.
(2008). The Evolution of Distance Education: Implications for Instructional
Design on the Potential of the Web. Techtrends: Linking Research And Practice
To Improve Learning, 52(3), 70-75.
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., &
Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of
distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.
Sunday, April 19, 2015
Converting to a Distance Learning Format
Converting
to a Distance Learning Format
Consider the following
scenario: A training manager has been frustrated with the quality of communication
among trainees in his face-to-face training sessions and wants to try something
new. With his supervisor’s permission, the trainer plans to convert all current
training modules to a blended learning format, which would provide trainees and
trainers the opportunity to interact with each other and learn the material in
both a face-to-face and online environment. In addition, he is considering
putting all of his training materials on a server so that the trainees have
access to resources and assignments at all times.
·
What are some of the pre-planning strategies the trainer needs to
consider before converting his program?
When converting a traditional classroom to a distance education
course, several elements will need to be considered while in the pre-planning
stages. First in the preplanning the trainer should check the server to insure
there is enough space and enough bandwidth to insure smooth flowing content is
presented. Next, there are several types of learning that can be used in a
distance education course: synchronous, asynchronous, and blended, in this case
we will be using blended e-learning environments in this situation (Simonson et
al, 2012). It is important to consider the audience and their characteristics
and any type of learning limitations. Next in preplanning it is important to
understand which of the delivery options that the instructor will want use and
which learning content the instructor wants to be delivered face to face verses
training materials that will need to be uploaded to the server. The trainer
will need to preplan the time line to insure completion. Next the trainer will
need to create systematic objectives in order to meet the trainer’s completion
goal.
·
What aspects of his original training program could be enhanced in
the distance-learning format?
The aspects of the original training program could be enhanced by
the distance-learning format through the use of interaction in the form of an
asynchronous discussion forum on the content assigned by the trainer, students
could respond to the discussion. Then the trainer could continue the discussion
in class using synchronous discussion, as the students will then have prior
knowledge of the content and this could create a greater quality of content
discussion the trainer is wanting (Simonson et al, 2012).
·
How will his role, as trainer, change in a distance learning
environment?
The role of the trainer will change in a blended e-learning, first
the cost of replication of all of the training materials, once developed the
trainer can reach many more employees and create a faster and more efficient
training program that employees can begin using immediately, thus reducing the
overhead cost of employ training programs. The trainer will also be able to
create trainings geared towards is department of the business.
·
What steps should the trainer take to encourage the trainees to
communicate online?
The trainer should encourage communication through a learner- centered
environment that promotes collaborative activities by designing pre-determined
discussion threads requiring a set determined number of student posts that is
graded by rubrics. This threaded discussion is one of the most powerful techniques used in
distance education (Simonson et al, 2012).” Also through the
discussions the trainer could use difference interfaces that compliment the
“desktops” with the use of augmented realities, virtual realities with the use
of avatars (Dede, 2005).
Resources
Culatta, Richard. (2013)
Instructional design.ADDIE. Retreived from
http://www.instructionaldesign.org/models/addie.html
Dede, C. (2005). Planning for neomillennial
learning styles. Educause Quarterly, 28(2), 7-12.
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S.,
Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a
distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA:
Pearson
Wednesday, April 8, 2015
The Impact of Open Source
In researching an Open
Course to select for this weeks assignment I finally found one that was
interesting to me. I choose Communicating in Cyberspace through MIT Open
Course Ware URL http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/comparative-media-studies-writing/21w-785-communicating-in-cyberspace-fall-2003/index.htm.
In reviewing the questions of the pre-planning I would have to say
that under the preplanning of course management, I noticed that the MIT course met some of the
“components of a course management system,” through the use of a dashboard that
presents the contents of a syllabus, and the assignments, however to fully meet
the preplanning requirements each assignment needs to be listed with learning the
objectives and an ongoing announcement area. This does not meet the full “components of
a course management system (Simonson et al, 2012).”
Also, I did not notice a student roster
and maybe I needed to enroll before I could see that. In the recommendations
for online instruction are mostly met. The required coarse readings are posted
in a designated area and I noticed that the discussion boards, group projects, are
set up to be selected through the student group choice, which all meet the
“components of a course management system (Simonson et al, 2012).” As an
instructional designer I would also add a course evaluation tool for my
students in order to meet the requirements of Simonson and et al, list of
“components of a course management system (2012). According to Beldarrian, through
the use of emerging technologies, which this course does, to individualize each
level of instruction and interaction, (2008).
In
answering the question did the course designer implement course activities that
maximize learning for the students; I would have to say yes. The learner’s
needs were the focus in the early stage of the designing (Simonson et al.
2012). The course designer in this MIT course knows that experienced technology
users would be enrolling in this course and are familiar with how to use
technology and the designer provides several options for group choices. The
designer knows that the more the needs of the learners are met, the more they
can feel confident in their engagement and their learning. Through the ability
to recognize the needs of our learners we can build and create more efficient
designs.
Resources
Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance
Education Trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction
and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2), 139-153.
doi:10.1080/01587910600789498
Edward Barrett. 21W.785
Communicating in Cyberspace, Fall 2003. (Massachusetts Institute of
Technology: MIT OpenCourseWare), http://ocw.mit.edu (Accessed 7 Apr,
2015). License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S.,
Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a
distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA:
Pearson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)